Responsive web design has become a hot topic for designers and developers, and the benefits are constantly being discussed. During the discussion, you often wonder what kind of website for mobile devices is best for you. Is there an option that works better? Many response models work well, although the redesign may require a lot of effort. Developers point out several ways and responsive design to prepare a website for mobile use. The next question is: what is the best?
There are three categories of mobile sites that developers prefer, which are listed below:
Specific site for mobile devices: This is a completely different version that is specifically configured to be viewed on a portable device. The main feature of any mobile website is that it loads very quickly and generally improves performance and navigation. The disadvantages are also important because the designer needs to create a separate website for each device, each with separate URLs.
Sensitive website design (RWD): This is a design that creates the design in a flexible format so that the content can be reformatted according to the access device. Features include the ability to provide the same content regardless of the device and have only one URL, because all devices are in the same location. Negative aspects imply a slower loading time because the content is not optimized for mobile use, but mobility is sometimes less efficient.
Responsive Design + Responsive Design + Server-Side Components (RESS): Implemented in Responsive Design, a second server-optimized, mobile-side code set that controls site behavior and performance. Basically, RESS is the design that responds, but it’s not a code but a code in the code. This provides improved codes and controls, as well as different instructions for a handheld device than a desktop computer or laptop, which improves performance. Professionals are the best of both worlds. The disadvantage of RESS is that mobile devices must be reliably detected and the server load is greatly increased.
What is better
The answer to this question will be different for each website depending on specific objectives and needs and can not be one of the above. If speed is a major concern, custom versions will earn the rest that will only be used if a separate URL is a problem. The responsive design is much better at visualization because it is very flexible, but comes with a support code for the desktop.
The RESS system seems to combine the advantages of both methods to achieve the end result: an uninflated portable site with the most convenient office code, which makes the system fast and maintains a responsive design. The main disadvantage is that the law is much more complex. If we leave aside the complexity, RESS can be the solution for those who want a flawless mobile website and who think alone, at least when the right device is recognized.
The creation of a website for mobile websites always has advantages and disadvantages, at least for the duration of the debate. Ultimately, the best technique depends on the site’s goals, the way it is used and the site’s behavior. Any type of experience can be an option to see which style gives the best results. At least, it’s true that using one of these methods is better than not offering a version for mobile devices!